Acer Predator XB241H Monitor Huge Offer On Cyber Monday Sales 2020

Deal Score0
Deal Score0

After testing what appears like 387,001 monitors with AMD FreeSync support, I’ve finally got another honest-to-goodness Nvidia G-Sync one on my desk today, the Acer Predator XB241H – and boy, it’s an excellent ‘un. Part of Acer’s XB1 range, this specific incarnation may be the 24in, 1920×1080, TN model. In addition, it comes as a 24in, 2560×1440 jobber and many different permutations with 27in, 28in and 32in screen sizes, but the key attraction of the particular string of letters and numbers is its lovely 144Hz refresh rate which can be overclocked up to massive 180Hz for ultra-high frame rate gaming.

Admittedly, every model except the 4K XB1s can hit at least 144Hz, so you’re not specifically losing from much in the frame rate department if you’d rather decide on a larger screen size or an increased resolution. However, if obtaining the most effective frame rate possible is vital that you you, it’s worth noting that the very best overclocked setting you’ll reach 1080p on the XB1’s larger 27in panel is 170Hz, and just 165Hz across its 1440p options.

Personally, I don’t think a supplementary 10-15 frames is absolutely likely to make that a lot of a difference, however the XB241H still has plenty to recommend it beside its ludicrous frame rate possibilities. To begin with, it’s not hideously expensive so far as Nvidia G-Sync monitors have a tendency to go nowadays, demanding around £380 in the united kingdom and $395 in america, and its own TN panel is surprisingly decent your money can buy.

Before I jump into specifics, however, a tiny (okay, large) word in what Nvidia G-Sync actually means. The bottom line is, that is Nvidia’s adaptive frame rate technology, which automatically adjusts the refresh rate of the monitor to complement the quantity of frames being pumped out by your graphics card. That is meant to help remove screen tearing when it’s chucking out way too many frames for the screen to take care of, and can also help remove any unnecessary stutter during small performance hiccups, resulting in smoother, more fluid game playing.

There are several extra bonuses that include Nvidia G-Sync panels aswell. Included in these are Ultra Low Motion Blur, which helps maintain things looking nice and sharp (especially at higher refresh rates, where one can sometimes see somewhat of a hazy trail if a monitor has particularly slow response times) and low input lag over DisplayPort. But the key thing is that dynamic refresh rate adjustment.

You’re also likely to get started on seeing more G-Sync HDR monitors arrive over the coming months aswell (merely to make things extra confusing), that can come challenging bits of tech mentioned previously and wide colour gamut and high dynamic range support. The XB241H isn’t among these – it just has regular G-Sync – nevertheless, you can read more in what HDR is and what G-Sync HDR monitors are about by hitting those nice pink links.

It’s also worth mentioning that G-Sync is an authorized, proprietary standard, and that each G-Sync panel has been pre-approved by Nvidia beforehand, ensuring you get the same degree of G-Sync experience whatever monitor you conclude buying. This usually adds quite the purchase price premium on your typical G-Sync monitor, making them a lot more expensive than their FreeSync counterparts. It is because FreeSync can be an open standard, thereby so that it is drastically cheaper to implement. The downside is that you can’t guarantee every FreeSync monitor will deliver the same sort of quality, as sometimes its variable frame rate tech is only going to activate within certain frame rate ranges, for instance, with some being truly a lot wider and more generous than others.

Obviously, G-Sync only works together with Nvidia graphics cards, while FreeSync is intended for AMD graphics cards. As such, the merits of 1 over the other could be a pretty moot point according to what sort of graphics card you have, but it’s worth considering if you’re considering upgrading soon or want to discover ways to create a new PC from scratch.

So, given that we’ve got the G-Sync stuff taken care of, think about that TN panel? Well, I’m very happy to report the XB241H is absolutely quite good. TN panels are usually known because of their fast response times, not their colour accuracy. The latter is commonly a little rubbish in comparison to fancier IPS screens, but my X-Rite i1 Display Pro calibrator showed that the XB241H can already show around 95% of the typical sRGB colour gamut straight from the box. That’s using the monitor’s default Account, but I acquired the same results when I switched to Standard aswell.

There are three other modes you can decide on here, including a dimmer Eco setting, an extremely sharp and slightly horrid-looking Graphics option, and a mildly oversaturated Movie mode, but I stuck with User in most of my testing.

What’s more, I only had to create a few adjustments to the monitor’s colour temperature settings (selecting an individual option and reining in the green value a bit) to push that sRGB figure somewhat higher to a far more respectable 97.5%. That’s pretty great so far as sub-£400 / $400 TN monitors go, and infinitely much better than the similarly G-Sync and 144Hz / 180Hz refresh rate-equipped Asus ROG Swift PG248Q.

Admittedly, the Predator XB241H isn’t quite as bright as the ROG PG248Q, hitting a peak brightness of around 385cd/m2 according to my measurements when compared to ROG’s 500cd/m2, but that’s still plenty of for doing offers when you’ve got blazing beams of sunlight to arrive through a local window. Believe me, I’ve tried it.

A marginally lower brightness level does mean the XB241H has lower black levels (0.34cd/m2 vs 0.43cd/m2, the nearer to 0.00cd/m2, the better) and an increased contrast ratio (an extremely pleasing 1117:1 vs a fairly more middling 949:1), leading to better-looking games with an increase of detail in them.

Of course, among the downsides of TN panels is that, generally, their viewing angles aren’t as wide as IPS. Thankfully, this isn’t a lot of a problem on the XB241H, as its height-adjustable stand helps it be super simple to obtain it right into a good position. Yes, there’s somewhat of colour shift at the edge of the screen when you consider it from the medial side, but really, who plays games with no their monitor directly before them? Plus, additionally you get plenty of swivel, tilt and rotation adjustment thrown in aswell, so you can use the monitor in portrait mode if you wish to.

The one thing the XB241H really is suffering from is too little ports. Just one single HDMI, one DisplayPort and a combined headphone and microphone jack are you arrive here, and that’s your lot. No USB hub, no extra HDMI. Nothing. To be fair, this is going to be fine generally (remember to utilize the DisplayPort for all those lovely high refresh rates), but hey, it’s always nice to have options, right?

Still, so long as you don’t mind the slightly ‘gamer’ look of the whole lot (what with those red pronged feet, headset hook across the back and general boxiness of its bezels), the Acer Predator XB241H is an excellent monitor indeed, and certainly one of the better gaming monitors I’ve seen as of this sort of cost range.

At £380 / $395, the XB241H can be among the better choices I’ve seen for all those after a G-Sync screen on a (relative) budget, too – at least in comparison to larger G-Sync screens just like the Acer Predator Z35p and AOC Agon AG352UCG. The Asus ROG Swift PG248Q is, admittedly, quite a lttle bit cheaper in america, but I still think I’d rather pay the excess $80 roughly for the XB241H’s superior panel. The XB241H is obviously the ideal solution in the united kingdom (here, the PG248Q costs £420), looked after doesn’t include any distracting LED lights either. If you’re after a {good quality|the

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply

      Blog Black Friday
      Logo
      Enable registration in settings - general