Best Acer Predator XB271HU Gaming Monitor For Cyber Monday 2020
Design and Features
The very first thing you’ll notice about the Acer Predator XB1 is it’s exceptionally well come up with. With big feet and a thick neck, the strong stand keeps the large, 27-inch panel firmly rooted set up. Mount the display on the stand, plug it in, and another things you’ll notice are its wafer-thin screen bezels and crisp 1440p picture. Acer’s Predator XB1 type of gaming monitors features either IPS or TN panels and range between a 23.8-inch 1080p model to a 32-inch, 4K model. My Predator XB1 test unit (model XB271HU) sits in the centre; it includes a 27-inch, IPS panel with Nvidia G-Sync, a 4ms response time, and a 144Hz refresh rate which can be overclocked to 165Hz.
More Expert Tech Roundups
So far as its design goes, Acer wants you to learn initially that the Predator XB1 is made for gaming. Together with the aggressive Predator name, the monitor features aggressive styling. You can’t skip the big, red feet on the bottom. They are brushed aluminum with an angular look that brings to mind a Transformer. Compared to that end, the wide neck offers a huge amount of flexibility. It enables you to rotate the display 30 degrees in either direction while providing six inches of height adjustment and 40 levels of tilt adjustment (five degrees forward and 35 degree back).
You may also rotate it into portrait orientation aswell. Regardless of how you position the display, the heavy, wide base and thick neck keep it from moving or wobbling. The only downside to all or any of this sturdiness may be the amount of desk property the monitor occupies. The wide-spaced, large feet mean this display isn’t ideal for cramped desks.
The buttons usually do not provide as intuitive a control as the tiny joystick you’ll find on other monitors.
Unlike the stand, the look of the display itself is rather understated. The only departure from its all-black design may be the Transformer-like Predator logo and name badge on underneath bezel and the light next to the energy button, which glows blue when the monitor is on. The screen bezel privately and top is practically non-existent, and underneath bezel measures only 0.9 inches wide. Five buttons in the sit next to the energy button in the lower-right to navigate the OSD. The buttons usually do not provide as intuitive a control as the tiny joystick you’ll find on some monitors, but you’ll get the hang of these after a a couple of days.
The display features features two video inputs: one DisplayPort and one HDMI. Choose DisplayPort and you’ll manage to use Nvidia G-Sync, the company’s adaptive refresh rate technology, and a refresh rate of 144Hz that one could overclock to 165Hz. With HDMI, you are stuck with a refresh rate of 60Hz.
In other connectivity news, the display features one upstream USB port and four downstream USB 3.0 ports. The downstream ports are split, with two on the trunk panel and two on the left edge of the display. Lastly, there’s a 3.5mm music jack on the trunk panel for external speakers or headphones. Getting the headphone jack on the left edge would make it much easier to find than needing to reach around back, but you’re more likely to require it for the reason that display’s internal speakers are predictably garbage.
I used Lagom LCD monitor test pages to measure performance including gamma, black and white levels, color gradient, and response time. Gamma was just from its target of 2.2 to arrive between 2.0 and 2.1, but I did so not see any proof a beaten up image when doing offers, viewing photographs or navigating Windows. Black and white levels were good however, not perfect; all but two boxes were obvious on both black level ensure that you white saturation test after making slight adjustments to brightness and contrast. It did better on the gradient test where it showed no banding. On the response time test; the display was practically perfect, scoring an ideal 0 on all rows except the first two, where I scored its slightest of flicker as a -10.
The take-away from these Lagom test outcomes? Black and white levels are strong nevertheless, you may lose some detail in very dark scenes and bright areas. But banding — where color and brightness variations show lines and bands instead of smooth color — will never be a problem. & most importantly for fast-twitch gamers, you should experience little to no motion blur.
Affirmed, gaming was super-smooth at its native resolution of 2560×1440 and stock refresh rate of 144Hz. In both Battlefield and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, quick-moving sequences looked natural without stuttering, despite having panicked, quick pans to focus on enemies. Nvidia’s G-Sync did its part of avoiding tearing.
More Comprehensive Monitor Reviews
As an IPS panel, the display offers a 4ms response time, which is slower compared to the 1ms you’ll get with a TN panel. The slower the response time, the much more likely you are to see some ghosting, but I saw none. The good thing about an IPS panel is wider viewing angles, which is important on a more substantial display like this, what your location is looking a lttle bit off axis at the edges of the display. The entire display — edge to edge — looked outstanding when seated before it when playing game or watch full-screen videos.
The Acer Predator XB271HU pairs well with GeForce-based rigs, where you could employ G-Sync for smooth gameplay. The largest drawback to an IPS panel such as this is its 4ms response time, but I’d happily take it over a TN panel simply for the wider viewing angles, plus I saw no proof ghosting. The strong base and thin bezels are also highlights, and make the Acer Predator XB1 a fairly easy recommendation for gamers on the pro